On 'Green Week' and In Which You’ll Find a Subtle Jab at Chris Matthews

Now that I have so much time on my hands and need something to keep me occupied other than huffing various paint and glue products, I have decided it’s time to get back to writing, or more accurately, my ridiculous form of it. Yet, be warned, I have really no idea where this blog entry is headed. Hell, for all I know it may well end up in the garbage can along with all those empty tubes of glue and cans of “Four Loko.”


So here I am back at my word processor to give it another go, but I find myself, again, really without topic. Thus, I assure you the title of this particular entry will be written long after I have completed my rambling, nonsensical treatise. I have been a little out of the political scene recently, though I did vote in the “historical” midterms, choosing my candidates and issues rather carefully after some deep meditation and an extended shroom trip (which in retrospect may be the reason why I voted for a write in referendum concerning the legalization of hoarding vast herds of cats), but other than that I really don’t know what to add at this time in regards to any deep political commentary. However, when all else fails I will resort to my old standby of criticisms. For there are plenty of things to criticize or poke fun at out there, not just in the political spectrum, but also in terms of media, pop culture, opinion and Charlie Sheen.


Charlie Sheen: Star of "Two and a Half Men"
Yes, it’s that time of the year again friends. No, I don’t mean the holidays. No, I mean it’s time for NBC’s annual annoying-ass “Green Week” extravaganza. As usual, just like every year, the famed NBC peacock is ripped of his classic colorful plumage and given the hues of a leprechaun. In addition, all your favorite NBC “stars” are out in their new Prius-praising “More You Know” segments, while, more often than not, after their shoot, they are jumping in their Hummer or SUV to help them navigate the difficult road conditions and terrain of West Hollywood, LA, New York, or Malibu.

The Impression That I Get - The Mighty Mighty Bosstones
As if these public service announcements weren’t annoying enough as they interrupt NBC’s mediocre at best primetime lineup, they continue on all shows throughout the lame NBC conglomerate of channels. This includes NBC proper, MSNBS and, of course, The Weather Channel. Yet, to quote Billy Mays, “Wait, there’s more!” Throughout the NBC aggregate, tiny, little catch phrases are featured with profoundly inspired slogans such as, “Green is Universal,” and “Green is Progress.” I don’t know about you, but just hearing them gives me a tingle up MY leg.


Yet, like the vast majority of those at NBC, with a few notable exceptions, these slogans are complete B.S. The former saying is not so much a call for more environmental awareness, or a push towards conservation and eco-friendly technologies, but rather, because NBC owns Universal, it seems to be NBC just patting themselves on the back while relishing in the supposed efforts that they have made. The latter saying is just plain silly, for though it can be said that with proper technologies, perhaps mankind’s effect on the planet could be minimized allowing the planet to become “more green,” it will never be as green as it once was before the influence of industrial pollutants. Giving that, if what I said is accurate, perhaps “Green is Retrogression” would be more accurate, or simply assign the title “eco-conservatism” to the idea. However, good luck getting anyone at NBC to say that accursed word. (Note the cheap shot.)


In reality, of course I know what they mean, but still I find all this green posturing, even evident in the peacock himself, to be extremely irritating. Certainly, we find that all this eco-posturing is big business as it is represented in products whose manufactures arbitrarily slap a “green,” “all natural,” or “organic” label on them despite the presence of things like arsenic and cadmium. Just because something is “all natural” doesn’t make it fit for ecology as a whole or, indeed, human interaction. Just because a poison dart frog may be “all natural,” I wouldn’t recommend sticking one in a blender with ice and vodka for a refreshing summer drink. Yet, many products and services offered commercially and by the government use these same tactics to entice people to subscribe or partake. It is not uncommon to hear consumer groups occasionally coming out against such eco-scams.


Now certainly, I am not an eco-hater or against any form of conservationism. Quite the contrary. Coming from a fishing family myself, I take a keen interest in preserving species and habitat, so as to help the fishing industry become profitable for both man and bear for years to come. Furthermore, just in case one would accuse me of being an egoist, other than these reasons and examples, I have also changed habits in my personal life to reduce my eco-footprint. I say this not to give myself an “atta-boy,” but rather to just clarify my own feelings on environmental conservation.


Thus, these feelings are completely divorced from the impression I get towards the eco-movement as a whole. It’s used mainly as a political ploy and the movement is completely guilt driven. In it villains are created, often times needlessly by hypersensitive eco-narcissists, which brand you, me, business and government as an enemy selfishly pushing the world towards destruction. In this process is lost each effort made by any individual or group towards conservation. Such efforts are mysteriously never mentioned by those same self-described “advanced” eco-sensitive narcissists, who frequently appear on TV to chastise us or, because of some being jobless since even before the economic meltdown, have nothing better to do than to ride bikes to rallies or protests, wave signs and commit acts of eco-terrorism. Course, with these acts of domestic terrorism they frequently contradict their own message. (In one inspired local instance, a group of eco-terrorists burned down a house which was built in forested area because the house and yard destroyed natural habit. Unfortunately, by this very act they actually burned to the ground several acres of natural forest themselves.) No affirmation for any progress is ever heard from such people, only condemnation.


Talking Heads - Burning Down The House
Thereby comes the annoyance factor at those who scream at government and business, wanting a technology now that doesn’t yet exist or is not efficient enough to be financially viable for any company. Yes, there are those who specialize in pursuing this technology, but they tend to be fringe companies or offshoots of various industry giants. Though at times I wonder if these offshoots just exist as an equivalent to a “green” label on a household cleanser. Yet, despite any effort they make, or no matter how many scientists a particular company may put on a particular eco-project, still it’s some of businesses fault that we are supposedly lagging in eco-technologies.


Can we really expect business to be our savior when it comes to ecology? I argue we can’t. Business is there to make money first and foremost. So if a market is there and profits are being made then there is no reason to engage in things that will compromise the company or make a share holder want do a swan dive off a busy freeway overpass. Does this mean that business may never find a viable, eco-friendly technology? Not at all, just it may not come from one of the business giants. It could through research and development, but the only reasons to engage in that are, by some government mandate, a PR ploy, in which case may not be efficient enough to be producing these new technologies, or to bring the company’s profits into the future, to where all businesses wish to be, at the forefront of such technological advancements to maximize the profits from the opportunities such advancement presents.


In business this is how success is measured, by the amount of capital. It would be nice to say that all businessmen and the heads of successful companies are planning on being martyrs for the good of the world, but they aren’t. The ultimate goal is to accumulate capital, so for them to spend billions of dollars on saving the planet and risking it for that reason alone isn’t really realistic. Yet, what is, is that some fringe company or company legitimately engaged in research and development, hoping to find another capital building enterprise, will stumble upon or improve technology, which will both make it economically viable and eco-friendly.

Technology, as well as the eco-movement, seems to be a form of social evolution. It naturally develops, is fine tuned, profited from and transforms, usually transcending its previous form. I feel from this “natural” process new technologies will emerge, or technologies that already exist will become increasingly efficient, made available to the populace becoming the new cash livestock industry of the future all based on public demand, cost, and ease of acquisition for the common man. Or woman for you feminists.



Did I mention I was going to recycle the cans of “Four Loko?” Just sayin’.

On Spite and How it Makes a Complete Spit Out of You and Me (Okay, Maybe it Doesn’t Work)

“I am a sick man. ... I am a spiteful man. I am an unattractive man. I believe my liver is diseased. However, I know nothing at all about my disease, and do not know for certain what ails me. I don't consult a doctor for it, and never have, though I have a respect for medicine and doctors. Besides, I am extremely superstitious, sufficiently so to respect medicine, anyway (I am well-educated enough not to be superstitious, but I am superstitious). No, I refuse to consult a doctor from spite. That you probably will not understand. Well, I understand it, though. Of course, I can't explain who it is precisely that I am mortifying in this case by my spite: I am perfectly well aware that I cannot "pay out" the doctors by not consulting them; I know better than anyone that by all this I am only injuring myself and no one else. But still, if I don't consult a doctor it is from spite. My liver is bad, well--let it get worse!” --Fyodor Dostevsky, “Notes From Underground”

Nonpoint - In the Air Tonight

There are many instances in our lives which when looked back upon bring about fond or not so fond memories, making us smile, laugh, cry or shudder with a severe kind of numbing embarrassment. Indeed, I quite recently I had a incident like the latter, one which will haunt me for a good few days anyway. It really isn’t that big of a deal, yet it was enough of one that I took notice and found myself wanting to find a way to reduce the chances of such a gross overreaction ever happening again.



Truth be told, recently I have been a kind of a jerk and my temper seems to fly wildly out of control, more so than I have experienced within my life prior to about three months ago, though admittedly this anger was more perpetual within me than it is currently. The whole thing centered around one of my inanimate arch nemesis’s: the fireplace pellet.



While accompanying a friend to a grocery store to get pellets for her fireplace, I thought I would carry the bags of pulp morsels to her vehicle. However, it seems I not only underestimated their weight, but their bulk, which made carrying these impossible (for me anyway for I am a complete pantywaist to begin with).



In the process of figuring this out, which probably wasn’t as sharp of a mental operation as it might have been otherwise, due to the “couple beers” I had. Whatever the case, drunk or stupid, or both, I momentarily struggled, when the cashier and the woman behind my friend suggested I grab a cart. Now, you would think they would find this pathetic display to be quite comical, yet it was the opposite. For some reason they were rather aggravated and quite, almost, angry.



Lets just say I didn’t respond in a healthy manner, mentally or for my back. My reaction, in retrospect, is more embarrassing than the actual fireplace feed fumbling. If I didn’t look like a moron yet, I was quickly about to, for I lifted the bags awkwardly against my chest and struggled towards the nearest door, my fingertips digging into the plastic sack. I half expected the bags to come tearing open, dumping the contents all over the floor. I suspect I would have been so embarrassed, I would have wept freely at that point and relocated in shame to some compound high in the mountains and deep in the woods, shying away from all men and cursing the day I ever walked into QFC.



So, if I would have just accepted their help, I could have walked out with my head held high, but I didn’t. Not only did I not, but I also got angry at the very mention of help, though their rudeness certainly had something to do with that and instead of stopping the spectacle, I made it worse by letting my frustration and anger get the best of me.

Today when recalling the episode, it makes me just shake my head with an uncomfortable chagrin and my mind moved to pondering the reaction. Sure, I could have just shrugged it off as a product of alcohol, but with my recent trip to Alaska, I have come to recall even incidence up there of similar reactions, where I would be on a certain task and receive instruction or constructive criticism concerning my duties. I reacted in much the same way, in fact, in spite, gleefully and angrily displaying a prominent disobedient disregard for the instruction. If it weren’t for these other circumstances, again, I just would continue shaking my head and the incident would have sunk into the recesses of my mind to be uncovered by some future therapist at a later date.



This being the case, what could I conclude were some of the contributing factors to my behavior? Dostoevsky is by far my favorite writer. The philosophy, psychology and theological themes contained within his well constructed prose never fail to pull me in. A running theme in many of his narratives is the psychological relationship between shame and pride. Moreover, Dostoevsky shows how these two seemingly contradictory views of the self can, either by themselves, or by interacting with the other affect our behavior. Certainly, I believe that both of these states conflicted in me at the time of the infamous “pellet incident,” but more so pride was evident.

With this identified, it got me to pondering the nature of pride and have found pride to be a volatile fragile viewpoint, which is almost the complete antithesis of what one might think. The ultimate paradox of the whole thing is that the greater the pride, the greater the opportunity to have it wounded, which directly breeds spite. This, I believe, was the process at work when I spazzed out in front of a friend and two complete strangers.



Both pride and shame threaten to change our perceptions of the world and how people view us. Often we deceive ourselves into thinking we are despised or even exalted in the eyes of others. Thus, our interactions in the world and even the friends we keep, or don’t keep, is reciprocal to how we view ourselves.

Yet, why is pride bad? Is it a bad thing to be proud of the things we do and accomplishment? No, of course not, this in itself is not a bad thing. Accomplishment and productivity are great things and the danger lies not in this but in the perversion of this view. We are not to twist our view of what we have done, not done, who we are, who we aren’t, and then juxtapose it with the accomplishments of others. This is where pride becomes unhealthy and a lot of mistreatment of peers and people in general comes from these underlying point of views.

Simply, I took great pride in the work of my own hands and what I had accomplished, but when I carried that into public and interacted with people, there was an inherent comparison there which resulted in an excessive anger in me. Not that I always keep it in remembrance or I was taking pride in juggling fireplace pellets, no. Rather, that in a continuum of hard work, I learned that challenging or pushing myself fed my pride and gave me means to raise myself up conceptually above others. So I guess subconsciously, when people rebuke me or offer instruction, it as if I have failed, which leads to shame. However, often times we use emotion as a defense against pain and when one spends much of his life in shame and finds pride, one such as me will use emotion to guard against shame from creeping in. As said earlier, the greater the pride, the greater the chances to have it wounded, meaning one will have to put on a bigger defense, become more sensitive and prone to anger as their pride grows.

So how to guard against this is the newest challenge. I have come to the realization that I lack a humility when it comes to viewing other people. Humbleness is not necessarily considering yourself lower than other people, for this can be dangerous at times, false, or lead to a sinking despair. Instead, to be humble in the healthiest of ways is to not compare yourself to people at all. Granted this a fine line to walk.



So back to the incident. I had failed at a mundane task, but how dare two people at QFC point out my fault. Who the hell do they think they are? Do they not know the things I have accomplished?

What a bastard I am! Yes, they were rude, but rudeness doesn’t have to go both ways, for that in itself would be pride talking. Rather, I should have moved on, accepted the help and then I could have spent tonight not pondering psychological questions, but goofing off on Facebook or something.



I don’t expect my behavior to change right away, but I expect that I will work on it. That’s really why I am writing this in the first place, that if it is written and posted, it may produce a conviction and accountability that will carry on long after the embarrassment has faded. To change such things like ones behavior, is not an easy thing, and not like, to use a cliché metaphor, flipping on and off a light switch, but one must go into training in order for the culmination of desire and conviction to come to pass.

Or it could have been the fact I was drunk.

On The Superbowl and a Quick Congrats

With this being the unofficial, unknown random subject blog under 20,000 hits of the New Orleans Saints, I felt that it was important for me to congratulate them on a job well done.

And to my friends:

On Alaska, Pumpin’ The Hump, and The Legend of Shackle Mouth: Part 1

Primus - John the Fisherman

Greetings Friends.

There are a couple things within my life I regret:

First, that class I accidentally took at the civic center concerning transgender meditation (stupid dyslexia).

Two, that I broke the first cardinal law of blog etiquette and failed to keep my blog constantly updated.

I have been in town a while now and when I first got back from Alaska it was true I was just too busy to write. Yet, I have been at home since September and now knowing that you may be asking yourself (if you have nothing better to think about, in which case I pity you) what have I been doing since and why I haven’t adhered to that aforementioned trespassed cardinal rule? For the most part, I have continued to work on the boat doing shipyard tasks and in my spare time have tried to think of a good excuse to mislead my blog readers into thinking that I am not some complete waste of space and that I really did have some pressing issue going on that kept me from writing. All this in order to cop-out of the encumbrance of responsibility which confronts me daily due to my lack of blogging discipline.



Yet, apparently when it comes to moving beyond the regular poop and fart jokes, my wits fail me. So, I could not come up with anything at all in terms of an excuse. Thus, with no other option, I have resorted to bring unto you an air of honesty and can only ask, and hope, for your forgiveness in this matter. If I can’t get that, then you can always just bite me and go visit Huffpo or something else you ungrateful pile.

With that out of the way, I thought I would take this time to reflect upon my adventures in the land of oil, Palin, and fish. Alaska is a state where the scenery runs the gamut between gorgeous and desolate, and the people run the gamut between alcoholics, drug addicts, recovering drug addicts, convicts and ex-convicts. Needless to say I felt right at home. Of course I jest. (I need to say that, for most the people up there have guns and I am planning on returning sooner or later.)



I spent 3 months over the summer working on a fine, seaworthy, 112-foot schooner, the “Sea Ern.” To clear up any confusion, the boat is named after a sea dwelling bird and not some buoyant transoceanic vessel used to store the ashes of the deceased. Its almost a perfect name because its not too cliché, and has an association with marine biology which isn’t too overbearing or tacky. I say “almost perfect” because of a superstition concerning boat names, but I will get into that later. At any rate, a lot of boat names are just stupid, or a little too esoteric, though you may occasionally run across an interesting one like the “Oh Snap,” or “The Happy Hooker.”



I worked with 4 others. There was of course Rolf, the captain who skillfully got us safely from port to port and who would sometimes yell out some not so gentle words of “encouragement“ to the crew when need be. There was Dennis (AKA “The Enigma“), the deck boss, crane operator, and avid professional wrestling fan with an itchy trigger finger. He was an all around likeable hard ass who was responsible for foreseeing that which went on upon the deck. There was Jack (AKA “Captain Jack Swallow”) the engineer who kept the boat running and whom you tried not piss off, for if that occurred, something wicked our way would surely and surly come. There was also Jason (AKA “The Social Butterfly,” and “The Main(e) Mojo”) a deckhand, crane operator, and proud New Englandish disciple of Tom Brady, who dreamed of being back home in Maine where he could sit on is porch and drink “beah’s” with his “dag.”


It was always odd listening to The Social Butterfly speak and it took some time getting used to because apparently in the state of Maine the alphabet only has 25 letters, for they seem to have no idea what an “R” is, or if they do, they only have a theoretical understanding of its use.

Then of course, there was me, Brandon, (AKA “B-Low,” and due to my ability to scamper about on deck with both grace and agility, “The Gazelle.”) a lowly deckhand. I was, along with Jason, a peon and did everything from pilot the boat on occasion, to cleaning up the galley. Since my culinary prowess can ruin Ramen, clean up usually was reserved for me. That’s okay, it turns out I would make a fine housewife someday. If I were into that. What a good wife I would be.



Looking Glass - Brandy (You're a Fine Girl)

So did I work on a fishing boat? No. Did I work on a processor? Again, No. So what the hell did I do?

I worked on a Tender.

In case you are too lazy to Google it, I have provided some visual aids and, obviously due to their quality, they are a large part of why this particular blog entry has taken so long to complete.

Below is a chart giving a brief description of the whole fishing process, which I have labeled “Fig. F.”



Now, as before mentioned and indicated in the above diaphragm, the Tender doesn’t actually do the fishing. There are two main ways that one goes about catching a load of Salmon. The Sockeye (Fig. S), or Red Salmon (Reds for short) are usually caught using what is called a gillnet, which most of you could quickly recognize and are familiar with. It is a net designed with a certain specified size mesh, which is stretched across a body of water and into which the salmon lodge their wee little heads and get snagged by the gills. The net is hauled up and the fish are plucked out of the net into large tote bags called “brailers.”.



The Pink (Fig. P), or Humpy Salmon (Humpy for short), were caught utilizing a seine net (the net pictured in Fig F.). These nets have a smaller mesh and are not designed for catching the salmon by the gills, but rather to impede escape. The nets are wrapped around a school of fish, and are hauled up, the net, pursing and growing smaller until the fish are concentrated within the snug confines of the net. At this point is where we come in.



Sockeye are fished in the Bristol Bay region of Alaska. After the catch, the fishing boats tie up along side us, and we pluck the bags out of their hold by use of a crane. The bags are then lifted on board and are carefully weighed via a scale. Hanging from that scale, is a pelican hook (Fig. A). This hook supports the bag and has a tag line connected to it. Once the weight is recorded the bag is maneuvered over a large metal “dump box.” Attached to this box, is a chute, which leads directly to a manhole of any of the three corresponding tanks. The tag line is pulled and the pelican hook disengages, dumping the fish into the box and they then slide down the chute into the designated tank. This of course is our method of fish transfer, however, and it varies somewhat from boat to boat.



In the Prince William Sound vicinity of Alaska, large amounts of hatchery Pink salmon pour into the various fishing grounds spotted throughout the sound. Here seine nets are used and the method of madness changes quite a bit. In this instance we tie up directly to the seine and take, what is in essence a rather large vacuum cleaner, and put the hose into the net (Fig. B). The vacuum is fired up and the fish are sucked upward through the hose onto a sorting table/dewatering box. From here they pour into a “weigh box,” which directly hangs upon a scale. Once the vacuums cycle is complete, the fish are weighed and with the weight being recorded are dumped into the dump box, where they then pour down the chute into a waiting tank (Fig C).





That is just the work aspect of the experience. However, when you don’t set foot on land for about a month and a half and are confined to the same vessel with the same people, there is obviously quite a bit more about the whole venture.

First off, one should be warned that any commercial fishing undertaking has the ability and probability of completely destroying friendships. That being said, it also has the ability to create them as well. My theory though is that friendships are made and destroyed in alternating cycles with each fishing season.



Fishermen, and tender men as it were, are a very superstitious bunch by nature. So much so, I am probably trespassing against several right now, just talking about fishing and tendering in this blog. Even, in fact, as I sit here, land locked within a Starbucks sipping on a grande “shot in the dark.” I got a taste of these superstitions right off the bat, when I ignorantly arrived at the boat carrying a hard-backed suitcase. This apparently caused a couple of the crew members to look upon me with great hesitation, for it is bad luck to have such a suitcase because of its resemblance to a coffin.



I don’t know how they cleansed the vessel of such stigma, though I am pretty sure it involved the burning of sage. Not that I witnessed them burning sage, just, it seems, that this particular act is like a metaphysical aspirin, the first step and near cure all when it comes to such things.



Some other curious superstitions are that there are to be no women aboard a boat. Though it might not be tough for some people, like those in a 70’s disco band, for me it was extremely difficult and I was really only able to get by thanks to a Nancy Grace bookmark I happened to run across. Oh Nancy, how I missed your feigned tirades of supposed outrage which only serve to feed your ego and inject a healthy dose of sensationalism into the media mainstream.



Also, there are to be no bananas on board. Though, it may be extremely tough for some people, like those in a 70’s disco band, for me it wasn't difficult at all because I get all my sustenance from a extra large bottle of Centrum Silver.

In The Navy - Valhalla

(I smell a Grammy)

One of the most profound fishing (I will refer to it as fishing, though it has already been explained that we don’t fish, its just quite honestly more aesthetically pleasing to say “fishing,” than “tendering.” In addition, an argument can be made that it is warranted due to tendering playing a vital and necessary role within the fishing industry) phenomenon’s which I ran across was that upon a fishing boat, everything is rendered with the innate ability to produce vital harm upon ones person. Even the most mundane of household, or boathold items as it were, become formidable weapons. I don’t expect anywhere else in the cosmos one can manage to lacerate themselves with a shampoo bottle, but once upon the water, one should remember to exercise caution while handling bodily cleansers.

If such an incident does unfortunately occur, one would be wise to keep it to themselves, for many hardened sea-salts get rather annoyed by those who complain about injury. So, knowing this, and being a fantastic klutz/moron, I had to devise some clever ways of keeping people from knowing about various injuries (though not all as there were several) and it was by these efforts I came across the best bandage ever made as far as I am concerned: Electrical tape. I think every hospital and first aid kit needs to be stocked to the rafters with piles of electrical tape, however that is a rant for another time.

And with that I must leave you for the time being, but there is still much more to be said. Yet, that will have to be saved for a later date (not that much later for much of it written). I wanted to produce it all in a single blog entry, but found myself wrapped up in an endless tangle of tangents. Thus, I need to write it in installments. Again, thank you for reading and thank you to everyone who spurred me on to sit at my laptop once again. Before I leave you though, I would just like to say that no pelicans were harmed or molested by me personally during the production of this blog article. There may be some indiscretions in my past that I might need to burn some sage for, but that’s for me to know and its none of your business thank you.



By the way, according to my sources at the International Bird Rescue Research Center, the Pelican was treated, released, and is now living comfortably in California eating more fish than Jeremy Piven.



Until next time, Brandon clear.